<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Source Criticical Analysis of Ancient Mythic Text</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stay-curious.com/archives/2009/10/08/source-criticical-analysis-of-the-lord-of-the-rings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stay-curious.com/archives/2009/10/08/source-criticical-analysis-of-the-lord-of-the-rings/</link>
	<description>Encouraging curiosity about the world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 21:46:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karyn</title>
		<link>http://stay-curious.com/archives/2009/10/08/source-criticical-analysis-of-the-lord-of-the-rings/comment-page-1/#comment-22815</link>
		<dc:creator>Karyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 23:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boulders2bits.com/?p=1875#comment-22815</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Ken, for the correction. I&#039;ve made the change. And thanks for playing along!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Ken, for the correction. I&#8217;ve made the change. And thanks for playing along!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Brown</title>
		<link>http://stay-curious.com/archives/2009/10/08/source-criticical-analysis-of-the-lord-of-the-rings/comment-page-1/#comment-22813</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 23:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boulders2bits.com/?p=1875#comment-22813</guid>
		<description>Excellent! Though I should note that Mark&#039;s blog is called Catholic and &lt;i&gt;Enjoying&lt;/i&gt; it.

I&#039;ve linked you &lt;a href=&quot;http://corthodoxy.wordpress.com/2009/10/10/the-sources-of-the-lord-of-the-rings/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, and offered a bit of a (tongue-in-cheek) response to Tim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent! Though I should note that Mark&#8217;s blog is called Catholic and <i>Enjoying</i> it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve linked you <a href="http://corthodoxy.wordpress.com/2009/10/10/the-sources-of-the-lord-of-the-rings/" rel="nofollow">here</a>, and offered a bit of a (tongue-in-cheek) response to Tim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Sources of The Lord of the Rings &#171; C. Orthodoxy</title>
		<link>http://stay-curious.com/archives/2009/10/08/source-criticical-analysis-of-the-lord-of-the-rings/comment-page-1/#comment-22812</link>
		<dc:creator>The Sources of The Lord of the Rings &#171; C. Orthodoxy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 23:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boulders2bits.com/?p=1875#comment-22812</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] want to check out our friend Mark Shea&#8217;s similar treatment of The Lord of the Rings, which Karyn Traphagen dug up somewhere or other: Experts in source-criticism now know that The Lord of the Rings is a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://stay-curious.com/archives/2009/10/08/source-criticical-analysis-of-the-lord-of-the-rings/comment-page-1/#comment-22798</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 18:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boulders2bits.com/?p=1875#comment-22798</guid>
		<description>Very amusing, yet it fails to address the suggestions of unevenness in the text that biblical source criticism begins from.  Reading the first few chapters of Genesis surely gives such a strong impression both of a finished whole and of component parts that some understanding like Alter&#039;s &quot;composite artistry&quot; seems required. First show that (some sections of) LOTR has such a sense of being a patchwork or collage and then the parody becomes much more pointed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very amusing, yet it fails to address the suggestions of unevenness in the text that biblical source criticism begins from.  Reading the first few chapters of Genesis surely gives such a strong impression both of a finished whole and of component parts that some understanding like Alter&#8217;s &#8220;composite artistry&#8221; seems required. First show that (some sections of) LOTR has such a sense of being a patchwork or collage and then the parody becomes much more pointed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

