<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Much ado&#8230; or much to do?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stay-curious.com/archives/2009/10/31/much-ado-or-much-to-do/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stay-curious.com/archives/2009/10/31/much-ado-or-much-to-do/</link>
	<description>Encouraging curiosity about the world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 21:46:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob MacDonald</title>
		<link>http://stay-curious.com/archives/2009/10/31/much-ado-or-much-to-do/comment-page-1/#comment-23037</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob MacDonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boulders2bits.com/?p=2246#comment-23037</guid>
		<description>Karyn - your question has sat for a day or two now in my mind and I awoke early this first day of standard time with thoughts about how we compartmentalize ourselves and others into degrees of acceptability and unacceptability. So I am critical of translations that inadvertently support a colonialist mentality or a policy of subordination of one group to another - so slave-free, male-female, right-wrong, in-out, protestant-catholic, head coverer - bald. The list is endless. What would I call the &#039;school&#039; of aleph-taf? Absolutist with respect to the letter-perfect nature of the Bible? Am I then relative or just vague in my own understanding? 

There are ways in which I strive for clarity and precision - but not for absolutism. My current question on the meaning of sacrifice (&lt;a href=&quot;http://stenagmois.blogspot.com/2009/11/looking-for-clear-headed-thinking-about.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;) and the careless use of that word reveals part of this. (You might be able to help here too.)

At the same time, though I am Anglican - great via media - I was prodded into hearing by the closed table Brethren - more precise absolutism I can hardly imagine. Yet to bring back a sinner from the way of death covers a multitude of sins. So I must respect the different tradition even if I suspect fear. Nonetheless when I see a confused absolutism, it hurts. Because our trust is not in words and letters - though I value every space of white fire - but in God who really does something more than titillate our intellect or comfort our convenience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Karyn &#8211; your question has sat for a day or two now in my mind and I awoke early this first day of standard time with thoughts about how we compartmentalize ourselves and others into degrees of acceptability and unacceptability. So I am critical of translations that inadvertently support a colonialist mentality or a policy of subordination of one group to another &#8211; so slave-free, male-female, right-wrong, in-out, protestant-catholic, head coverer &#8211; bald. The list is endless. What would I call the &#8216;school&#8217; of aleph-taf? Absolutist with respect to the letter-perfect nature of the Bible? Am I then relative or just vague in my own understanding? </p>
<p>There are ways in which I strive for clarity and precision &#8211; but not for absolutism. My current question on the meaning of sacrifice (<a href="http://stenagmois.blogspot.com/2009/11/looking-for-clear-headed-thinking-about.html" rel="nofollow">here</a>) and the careless use of that word reveals part of this. (You might be able to help here too.)</p>
<p>At the same time, though I am Anglican &#8211; great via media &#8211; I was prodded into hearing by the closed table Brethren &#8211; more precise absolutism I can hardly imagine. Yet to bring back a sinner from the way of death covers a multitude of sins. So I must respect the different tradition even if I suspect fear. Nonetheless when I see a confused absolutism, it hurts. Because our trust is not in words and letters &#8211; though I value every space of white fire &#8211; but in God who really does something more than titillate our intellect or comfort our convenience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karyn</title>
		<link>http://stay-curious.com/archives/2009/10/31/much-ado-or-much-to-do/comment-page-1/#comment-23035</link>
		<dc:creator>Karyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 07:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boulders2bits.com/?p=2246#comment-23035</guid>
		<description>Thank you, Gary. I was quite surprised (and encouraged) by the Biblioblog Top 50 results for October. 

KLT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Gary. I was quite surprised (and encouraged) by the Biblioblog Top 50 results for October. </p>
<p>KLT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Manning</title>
		<link>http://stay-curious.com/archives/2009/10/31/much-ado-or-much-to-do/comment-page-1/#comment-23034</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Manning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 07:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boulders2bits.com/?p=2246#comment-23034</guid>
		<description>Congratulations on making the Biblioblog top 50 - and receiving special mention for going up so many places!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations on making the Biblioblog top 50 &#8211; and receiving special mention for going up so many places!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Manning</title>
		<link>http://stay-curious.com/archives/2009/10/31/much-ado-or-much-to-do/comment-page-1/#comment-23018</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Manning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 00:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boulders2bits.com/?p=2246#comment-23018</guid>
		<description>Good title for your post - and good questions. I usually don&#039;t bother addressing these &quot;Christian urban myths&quot; until someone posts questions about them to my blog. For example, I only &lt;a href=&quot;http://eutychusnerd.blogspot.com/2009/08/barack-obama-antichrist.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;posted&lt;/a&gt; on the &quot;Obama = antichrist&quot; phenomenon because people were asking me to refute the claims of that video.

You have an excellent point about civility in posting - and I have the feeling that it would be best to respond merely factually (if at all) rather than throwing in little pokes at the speaker. You can see that I had a hard time showing restraint in my blog post on this topic, as well as in my comments on your earlier post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good title for your post &#8211; and good questions. I usually don&#8217;t bother addressing these &#8220;Christian urban myths&#8221; until someone posts questions about them to my blog. For example, I only <a href="http://eutychusnerd.blogspot.com/2009/08/barack-obama-antichrist.html" rel="nofollow">posted</a> on the &#8220;Obama = antichrist&#8221; phenomenon because people were asking me to refute the claims of that video.</p>
<p>You have an excellent point about civility in posting &#8211; and I have the feeling that it would be best to respond merely factually (if at all) rather than throwing in little pokes at the speaker. You can see that I had a hard time showing restraint in my blog post on this topic, as well as in my comments on your earlier post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

